GetWebstack logo

THE VALIDATION LAYER FOR AI-NATIVE TEAMS

Catch bugs before your users do.

Test your app end to end, fast and reliably. See what's broken and the code behind it. No staging to maintain, no code to write.

Get started free

Join our Slack

/gws-qa-generatedrafts the cases, you review
Test Casesfeature/bg-color-text
Acceptance criteria4 covered1 gap
  • ✓AC-1 Homepage uses the warm off-white background 01-home-background-color
  • ✓AC-3 Headline begins 'Ship faster with' 03-hero-title-text
  • !AC-5 Signup CTA label updates no test yet

Seed data a logged-in demo user with three sample projects

Generated cases
  • 01-home-background-color Homepage uses the warm off-white background MED
  • 02-hero-badge-text Hero badge shows the new label LOW
  • 03-hero-title-text Hero title uses the refreshed copy HIGH
  • 04-hero-subtitle-text Hero subtitle uses the reworded copy LOW
/gws-qa-runruns test cases, you get the report
QA Run Report✗ Failed

3 passed · 1 failed of 4

Branch feature/bg-color-text · Commit 675096d · Wall clock 44s

  • ✓ Homepage uses the warm off-white background 41s
  • ✓ Hero badge shows the new label 39s
  • ✗ Hero title uses the refreshed copy HIGH44s

    Expected headline begins 'Ship faster with', not 'Build faster with' (AC-3)

    Actual headline reads 'Build faster with PostgreSQL, Express, React & Node'

    The hero headline still reads 'Build faster with'. The AC-3 copy change did not ship in the deployed build.

    Suspected code areaclient/src/pages/HomePage.jsxclient/src/index.css

    Screenshot of the failure: the deployed hero still shows the old headline
  • ✓ Hero subtitle uses the reworded copy 43s

The problem

AI ships faster than you can validate.

AI writes hundreds of PRs. Testing each by hand doesn't scale, so it quietly stops and the bugs surface in production.

  • Your AI codes blind.

    Agents see only your codebase. Code that looks right breaks the moment it touches a live stack.

  • You're the bottleneck now.

    You cut QA to move faster. Now every merge waits on you, and validation is the slowest thing you do.

  • Bugs reach prod.

    Shipping sped up. QA didn't. The bugs land where customers find them first.

How it works

Start with a feature. Get a QA report with two prompts.

No test scripts to write. GetWebstack reads your code and drafts the cases. You review and edit, so you own what gets tested.

Claude Code
Hey Claude, run /gws-qa-generate
I'll generate test cases from the diff on your branch.
gws-qa-generate
Reading the diff on feature/bg-color-text…
Drafted 4 test cases from the change
01-home-background · 02-hero-badge · 03-hero-title · 04-hero-subtitle
AC-5 gap: no case covers the signup CTA
Drafted 4 cases and flagged one gap. Open this URL to review and edit them, or tell me what to modify:
https://app.getwebstack.com/qa/pern-stack/cases
Ask Claude what to modify…
⏎ send⇧⏎ newline? shortcuts

Step 1

Analyse & generate
    GetWebstack drafts test cases for exactly what changed, maps them to the branch's acceptance criteria, and proposes the seed data each case runs against.

Step 2

Review test cases
    Review the drafted cases and the seed data in the dashboard. Tighten the wording, add a case for the flagged gap, or tell Claude what to change. The suite you approve is what runs, so the QA reflects your intent, not a guess.
app.getwebstack.com/qa/cases
Test Casesfeature/bg-color-text
Acceptance criteria4 covered1 gap
  • ✓AC-1 Homepage uses the warm off-white background 01-home-background-color
  • ✓AC-3 Headline begins 'Ship faster with' 03-hero-title-text
  • !AC-5 Signup CTA label updates no test yet

Seed data a logged-in demo user with three sample projects

Generated cases
  • 01-home-background-color Homepage uses the warm off-white background MED
  • 02-hero-badge-text Hero badge shows the new label LOW
  • 03-hero-title-text Hero title uses the refreshed copy HIGH
  • 04-hero-subtitle-text Hero subtitle uses the reworded copy LOW
Claude Code
Hey Claude, run /gws-qa-run
Running the 5 reviewed cases against a fresh deploy of your branch.
gws-qa-run
Deployed your app + dependencies, seeded data. Running 5 cases…
01-home-background 41s
02-hero-badge 39s
03-hero-title 44s
04-hero-subtitle 43s
05-signup-cta 40s
4 passed · 1 failed. Report ready.
1 case failed. Open the full report:
https://app.getwebstack.com/qa/pern-stack/runs/675096d
Ask Claude to fix what failed…
⏎ send⇧⏎ newline? shortcuts

Step 3

Run in parallel
    GetWebstack clones your app (frontend, API, worker, database) with controlled seed data in isolated environments, and agents run the test cases in parallel.

Step 4

Get your QA Report
    You get a shareable report: pass/fail per case, screenshots, videos, and the suspected code area that broke.
app.getwebstack.com/qa/runs/241975cf
QA Run Report✗ Failed

3 passed · 1 failed of 4

Branch feature/bg-color-text · Commit 675096d · Wall clock 44s

✗ Hero title uses the refreshed copy HIGH

Expected headline begins 'Ship faster with', not 'Build faster with' (AC-3)

Actual headline reads 'Build faster with PostgreSQL, Express, React & Node'

Steps 1. goto /   2. read hero headline: got 'Build faster with'

Suspected code areaclient/src/pages/HomePage.jsxclient/src/index.css

Screenshot of the failure: the deployed hero still shows the old headline

Works with your coding agent, on any stack.

The QA loop runs as skills inside your coding agent.

Claude Code
Codex
Cursor
Gemini
TypeScriptPythonGoReactNode.js+ your stack
Zero-config agentic infrastructure generation.

Why GetWebstack

While others detect symptoms, we find the cause.

Deploy a clone of your app from your repo (full stack, with controlled data), so every failure is reproducible and traced to the code that caused it.

Deterministic seed data.

Control the data your app runs on. A failure is a real bug, never a flake.

Split cases into parallel runs.

Run tests in minutes, not hours. We create groups of test cases that don't interfere and run them in their own isolated sandboxes.

Every failure points at the code.

Each failure names the changed code that caused it, not just what broke on screen.

A business brain per repo.

We remember every branch's criteria, coverage, and gaps, and make sure they align with your business.

Runs on your infra, or ours.

Keep control of your code.

Catch the next bug
before it reaches your users.

Create an account and start free, or bring one risky branch to a call and we'll run your first QA report with you.

Get started freeBook a call