Ship fast with AI.
Catch the bugs first.
You build with Claude and Cursor. GetWebstack is the QA layer that finds what broke — and the code behind it — before your users do. No staging to maintain, no tests to write.
Free to start · Tests your app from the repo · Runs on your infra, or ours
Shipping with AI broke the safety net.
Your AI writes code faster than anyone can review it.
Claude and Cursor generate whole features in minutes. Reading and checking them by hand takes longer than writing them ever did.
You have no QA, and no time to build one.
No staging to maintain, no test suite, no QA hire. So every change ships half-checked and you hope nothing important broke.
Your users find the bug first.
With nothing checking a branch before it merges, the bug report comes from a customer instead of a test — after it already cost you the trust.
GET CUSTOM SUPPORT
Book a 30-minute call
and we'll set up QA on your repo.
We'll wire GetWebstack to your project, generate your first test cases, and walk through a real branch QA report together.
Free · 30 minutes · No commitment
How the QA layer works
Your AI codes fast. Nothing checks it.
Most AI-QA tools point at a URL you have to deploy and keep running. GetWebstack does the opposite: it builds your app from the repo — frontend, backend, database, routing — straight from a branch.
Then it reads what the branch changed, drafts test cases for the real user flows it touches, and runs them against that fresh environment. You review the cases; it does the rest.
No staging to maintain. Just point it at a branch.
A red result should be a real bug.
When a test fails against your live app, the first question is always: is it the code, the data, or the environment? That doubt is why teams stop trusting their tests.
Because GetWebstack builds the environment and seeds the data, a failure is reproducible. Run it again and it fails the same way. And the report points at the code area that caused it, so you know where to look.
A failure is a real bug, never a flake.
Catch it in the branch, not in production.
Every branch gets its own isolated environment, so you can QA ten pull requests at once without them stepping on each other. The check runs before the code merges, while the bug is still cheap to fix.
And the report has two readers. You get the trust artifact. Your coding agent reads the failures — repro steps and suspected code area — and works them back toward green.
Get started
Two commands. A QA report on your branch.
Generate the cases
Reads your branch diff and drafts test cases mapped to the real user flows it changed. You review and edit before anything runs.
Per branchRun them against your app
Builds the full stack from your repo, seeds the data, and runs the cases in parallel — each in its own isolated sandbox.
Per branchSee what broke, and why
Expected vs. actual, steps to reproduce, and the code area behind each failure. Your agent works the failures back toward green.
Every runWho this is for
Built for founders shipping with AI.
AI-native SaaS builder
You ship Claude- and Cursor-written code every day. You want it verified against a real run before your users ever see it.
Solo or early-team founder
No QA hire, no staging to babysit. You need a check that runs itself on every branch so you can keep shipping.
ML / non-frontend founder
You know your models. You're less sure the full-stack plumbing — APIs, database, frontend — actually holds together. GetWebstack tests the whole flow.
Fast iteration, frequent releases
You ship constantly and test with real users early. Every branch gets a QA report before it touches main.
Catch the bug
before your users do.
Point GetWebstack at a branch and get a QA report with the code behind every failure.
Free to start · Tests your app from the repo · Runs on your infra, or ours