GetWebstack logo
ConnectPricingBlogDocs

GetWebstack vs Ona

Two tools built to give developers and AI agents real environments to work against. Same problem space, completely different philosophy.

GetWebStack
  • Runs on your machine or your cluster
  • Source code never leaves your infra
  • One command, zero config
  • MCP-native, any agent
  • Flat cost, no metering
Ona
  • Runs on Ona's cloud or your AWS VPC
  • Managed infrastructure, remote VMs
  • Cloud account + devcontainer setup
  • Proprietary Ona Agent runtime
  • Consumption-based billing (OCUs)
Architecture

The fundamental difference:
where your code lives

This is the fork in the road. Every other difference flows from this single architectural choice.

GetWebStack

Runs entirely on your infrastructure

GetWebStack spins up isolated Kubernetes namespaces on your local machine or your own cluster. There is no management plane sitting in a third-party cloud. Your source code, secrets, and build artifacts never leave the machine they run on.

  • Runs on macOS, Linux, Windows locally
  • Deploy to any existing Kubernetes cluster
  • No cloud account, no VPC to configure
  • Works air-gapped by design
Ona

Runs on Ona's cloud or your AWS VPC

Ona provisions remote VMs in its own multi-tenant cloud (US and EU regions) or inside a customer-managed AWS VPC for enterprise accounts. Your environments live on infrastructure Ona orchestrates, not on your local machine.

  • Multi-tenant cloud (US + EU) or AWS VPC
  • Remote VS Code in browser or local IDE via extension
  • Ona's management plane handles auth and coordination
  • Source code stays in runners, not Ona's control plane
Why this matters for privacy-sensitive teams: If your team works under data residency requirements, handles proprietary codebases, or cannot send source code through third-party infrastructure, GetWebStack's local-first model is the cleaner fit. With Ona, even on a self-hosted VPC, Ona's management plane still handles authentication and coordination.
AI Agent Support

Both support AI agents.
Very differently.

AI coding agent support is where these two tools diverge most sharply in philosophy.

GetWebStack

MCP-native sandboxes, zero lock-in

Install the GetWebstack MCP server once with gws mcp install and any MCP-compatible agent — Claude, Cursor, Codex, Opencode — immediately gets the ability to spin up isolated sandboxes, read logs, and validate its own changes against real running infrastructure.

  • One MCP server, any compatible agent
  • Each agent gets its own full isolated stack
  • No proprietary agent runtime to adopt
  • Agents work against local or on-prem infrastructure
Ona

Ona Agents — powerful but proprietary

Ona runs its own AI agent runtime inside its environments. Agents write code, run tests, open PRs, and respond to review feedback autonomously. They can be triggered from Linear issues, Slack messages, or Sentry errors. Multiple agents run in parallel across different environments.

  • Built-in agent runtime (Ona Agent)
  • Background automations on schedules or triggers
  • AGENTS.md for project convention guidance
  • Claude Sonnet 4 as default LLM (enterprise: configurable)
The key tradeoff: Ona's agents are more autonomous and production-ready for background workflows. GetWebstack's approach gives any agent you already use a real environment to work against without adopting a new agent runtime or switching LLMs.
Side by side

Feature comparison

The full picture at a glance.

Feature
GetWebstack
Ona
Infrastructure
Local machine or your own Kubernetes cluster
Ona cloud (US/EU) or AWS VPC
Source code leaves your infra?
✓ Never
~ VPC only (enterprise)
Setup time
One command: gws init && gws up
Cloud account + devcontainer config
Zero config detection
✓ Auto-detects stack
~ Template-based setup
AI agent integration
MCP-native — works with any MCP agent
Built-in Ona Agent runtime
Agent lock-in
✓ No lock-in
✗ Ona Agent runtime
Parallel environments
✓ Per branch/worktree
✓ Per task/environment
Local dev support
✓ First-class
~ Remote IDE primary
PR preview environments
✓ Built-in
✓ Built-in
Pricing model
Flat — runs on your hardware
Consumption-based (OCUs per task)
Predictable cost
✓ No per-usage billing
~ Variable (OCU usage)
Enterprise SSO / RBAC
~ Cluster-level
✓ Built-in enterprise
Audit logs
~ Infrastructure-level
✓ Full compliance suite
Background agent automations
✗ Not included
✓ Triggers from Linear, Slack, Sentry
Pricing

Very different cost models

GetWebstack runs on your own infrastructure. Ona bills per task completed.

GetWebstack

Pay for the platform, not per environment

GetWebstack runs on your own machine or cluster, so infrastructure cost stays with you rather than accumulating on a third-party bill. There is no per-environment creation fee, no metered compute unit, and no bill-shock risk from an agent running longer than expected.

Ona

Ona Compute Units (OCUs) — per task

Ona bills by OCUs, which cover both environment and agent usage. Creating a new app from scratch costs around 4 OCUs; adding a feature to a mid-size project costs around 8 OCUs. The platform warns that there is "large variability in the number of OCUs consumed per task", which means costs can be unpredictable at scale.

Decision guide

Which one is right for you?

Neither tool is universally better. They serve different teams and different constraints.

Choose GetWebstack if…

  • ✓ Your team cannot send source code through third-party cloud infrastructure
  • ✓ You want each developer and AI agent to have their own full stack, without any infrastructure knowledge required
  • ✓ You want AI agents to work against your local or on-prem stack — using Claude, Cursor, or Codex — without adopting a new agent runtime
  • ✓ You want predictable infrastructure costs with no per-task billing
  • ✓ You're starting from a fresh repo or small team and want the fastest path from clone to running environment
  • ✓ Local development is a first-class workflow, not a secondary concern

Choose Ona if…

  • ✓ Your team is comfortable running environments in a managed cloud or AWS VPC
  • ✓ You want fully autonomous background agents — triggered from Linear, Slack, or Sentry — without managing any Kubernetes
  • ✓ Enterprise compliance is a hard requirement: SSO, RBAC, audit logs, command deny-lists
  • ✓ You want agents to write, test, and ship code entirely autonomously, not just validate changes
  • ✓ Your team works across multiple devices and needs environments accessible from any browser

Try GetWebstack free

No cloud account. No credit card. Your stack, running locally in under 5 minutes.

Get started freeRead the docs
GetWebstack logo

Product

Get StartedBlogPricing

Comparison

OnaSignadotTilt

Developer

Docs

Project Templates

JS / TS backendJS / TS frontendReact + ExpressPythonGo

Contact us

contact@getwebstack.com
Privacy PolicyTerms of Use
© Copyright 2026, All Rights Reserved  · Made in France